Photoshop Exposes Optical Illusion

One of these optical illusions came across my desk again…

optical illusion

which claims that the fields marked A and B have the same gray level. Just looking at the image it is obvious that this could not possibly be. So, normally, the untrained non-scientific mind would push it aside, maybe say, wow, really?! and wander on.

But this is where I came in – a trained scientist! And this scientist now really had enough of this and went on the quest to look for himself.

I started up trusty photoshop, zoomed into an area that contained both the fields A and B, cut a bit out of field A and dragged it next to field B …

optical illusion demonstrated

And what do you know? When the cut out little square from A is right next to field B, it is very clear that they are the same shade of gray – quod erat demimonstrum!

And we still trust our eyes? A little shadow so that the eye ‘thinks’ that the field must be brighter, makes it brighter for the eye. Could not help contemplating how many things there are that I don’t see and how many things I see that are not there.

UPDATE:

I was really surprised that there was so much discussion about this relatively irrelevant subject, but it went even further than somebody even accusing me of cheating. Somebody made a life-action demonstration this this little optical illusion and I just have to share this here:

YouTube Preview Image

No related posts.

This entry was posted in Science, Video and tagged , , , , , , . Bookmark the permalink.

17 Responses to Photoshop Exposes Optical Illusion

  1. ashley says:

    are you sure that it wasnt saying the LETTER a and the LETTER b are the same shade of gray

  2. Liono says:

    hhahahahaha i think thats exactly right ashley – HHAHAHAHAH shut down in one sentence author..feel gooooooooooooooood?

  3. Noodle says:

    That is cool! I did the same thing… and what do you know? It was right!

  4. Mia says:

    that ia really crazy! i couldn’t believe it!!!

  5. Chuck says:

    Sorry folks but look closely . . . .
    The little, lower right corner that came from the square A cut out is lighter. Also why is the square next to B not the same as the piece from A?
    Call me . . . I have a bridge you might be interested in.

  6. Merlin says:

    wow – I had not expected any comments on THAT post – this is so irrelevant – and yes, I really just cut out a square in photoshop and moved it – did not try to trick anybody – if you think of conspiracy then just try it yourself – it’s easy enough – and yes, this little (seemingly) white corner is really the medium gray from two fields above – but again – if it’s that important for you – just try it yourself. Then do something important and think about something like supporting our troops

  7. oh noodles your right says:

    i tried it and its true. I was sosurprised

  8. Drift says:

    Wow!

    When i do that it doesnt come out the same

  9. Drift says:

    oh i did it wrong, it is the same shade..

  10. confused lol says:

    omg dat is rlle weird lol it cant be right
    :)

  11. bilbo says:

    wtf? this is retarted

  12. james says:

    of course the square next to B is the same w/ A, but because of the shade the color changes(RGB).

  13. steve says:

    just tried it in photoshop using the eyedropper tool on the a b squares and other squares as well…a and b match…i need to review this further

  14. Bob says:

    Haha yeah for all you people that say it doesn’t work… try it yourself!

  15. its true says:

    no this is true i got it on paint took out a square out of all the light spaces tht wer grey and put it onto the white space with the shadow onto it it works

  16. aswq says:

    its all about the shadow of the green cylinder.

  17. Matt says:

    aswq, I agree with you 100%

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

*

*

You may use these HTML tags and attributes: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>